Miss California’s views on same-sex marriage were first dismissed simply as the ramblings of a religious fanatic. What could be worse than having your head filled with religious mumbo-jumbo? Why, having your breasts filled with silicone, of course.
There you have it. It’s a double whammy proving that she’s just ignorant trailer trash in a designer dress.
Add to that the shocker that the Miss USA Pageant actually paid for the implants.
Is there a scandal here? Do you feel cheated and abused learning that the entertainment industry dangled a scantily clad woman before your eyes after refitting her with some artificial enhancements?
On the other hand, if we discover next week that some other contestant in the pageant is transgendered and had undergone a more radical surgical procedure, we could anticipate that the gender-irrelevance crowd would rush to his/her defense. We would see sympathetic press coverage with reporters dutifully reading the LGBT talking points:
Transgendered persons include pre-operative and post-operative transsexuals, transgenderists (persons living full-time in a gender other than their birth sex with no desire to pursue surgery); transvestites (preferred term: crossdressers, those whose gender expression occasionally differs from their birth sex); “mannish” or “passing” women, whose gender expression is masculine and who are often assumed to be lesbians, although this is not necessarily the case; “feminine” men who are often assumed to be homosexual, although they are just as often heterosexual; and intersexed persons, whose sex was arbitrarily assigned after birth and who often manifest physical characteristics, expression or identity that differs from the sex assigned without their consent.
And the sympathetic coverage would continue right up to the moment when the transgendered winner fails to support the latest political cause du jour or confesses the faith of Christ crucified.
Comments on this entry are closed.